More Recent Comments

Monday, October 12, 2009

Intelligent Design Creationism

Some people in the intelligent design community don't like it when we refer to their beliefs as "Intelligent Design Creationism." They claim they aren't creationists when they talk about an intelligent designer who created spoke designed life.

Nick Matkze got involved in a discussion with one of those people. It's worth reading his comments on Panda's Thumb: The truth hurts. Check out the comments as well. The posting pretty much covers the main issues in the debate.

As usual, the Intelligent Design Creationists (a.k.a. IDiots) don't have a rational leg to stand on.


  1. There are people who support ID based on the scientific evidence.

    I am one of those people.

    There is also a group advocating "religious creationism" based on faith.

    I am not one of them. In fact I am a life-long (since I was 15) atheist/agnostic.

  2. Let's ALWAYS use 'creationist intelligent design' when referring to ID!

  3. Mr. Wagner, if your ID depends upon any sort of supernatural power then it cannot, by default, be scientific. So I presume you are postulating that we are designed by something entirely natural, like an advanced extraterrestrial species.

    Any pictures?