More Recent Comments

Sunday, December 03, 2006

Natalie Angier's God Problem

 

It's been three years since Natalie Angier first wrote "My God Problem." There's a copy of the essay on Edge. It should be required reading for every scientist. Here are some excerpts,
No, most scientists are not interested in taking on any of the mighty cornerstones of Christianity. They complain about irrational thinking, they despise creationist "science," they roll their eyes over America's infatuation with astrology, telekinesis, spoon bending, reincarnation, and UFOs, but toward the bulk of the magic acts that have won the imprimatur of inclusion in the Bible, they are tolerant, respectful, big of tent....

So why is it that most scientists avoid criticizing religion even as they decry the supernatural mind-set? For starters, some researchers are themselves traditionally devout, keeping a kosher kitchen or taking Communion each Sunday. I admit I'm surprised whenever I encounter a religious scientist. How can a bench-hazed Ph. D., who might in an afternoon deftly purée a colleague's PowerPoint presentation on the nematode genome into so much fish chow, then go home, read in a two-thousand-year-old chronicle, riddled with internal contradictions, of a meta-Nobel discovery like "Resurrection from the Dead," and say, gee, that sounds convincing? Doesn't the good doctor wonder what the control group looked like?

2 comments :

Anonymous said...

Because the "Control Group" is something like Opus Dei or the Taliban....
And "normal" religious belief seems harmless, by comparison.

Only seems harmless, mind you.

Lish said...

This was an excellent essay, and I thank you for pointing me toward it. I shall pass it along to my fellow scientists given its important message.