This is getting to be really annoying. What is it about the concepts of junk DNA and Darwinism that confuse the IDiots? It's not rocket science.
In today's posting on the Discovery Institute anti-science website, Casey Luskin leads off an anti-evolution posting with,
It’s beyond dispute that the false “junk”-DNA mindset was born, bred, and sustained long beyond its reasonable lifetime by the neo-Darwinian paradigm.Let me try and make this simple for the IDiots.
- Junk DNA is here to stay. It's a lie to claim that the concept has been abandoned by scientists. True, there are some stupid scientists who don't understand what's going on but they do not represent the consensus.
- The concept of junk DNA is anti-Darwinian. There's no possible way that a true Darwinist could accept junk DNA. It is incredibly ignorant to claim that the idea of junk DNA was "born, bred, and sustained" by the neo-Darwinian paradigm. On the contrary, it has helped overturn that paradigm, replacing it with a more pluralistic approach to evolution.
How much earlier might these non-coding “junk” DNA causes of disease have been recognized had scientists operated under an intelligent design paradigm rather than a Neo-Darwinian one?Me, me, me (pumping his hand in the air). I know the answer ...