More Recent Comments

Monday, November 08, 2021

The origin of SARS-CoV-2 and gain-of-function research

I'm currently discussing the meaning of "function" with a small group of scientists and philosophers and it's not easy to come up with an acceptable definition. Imagine how much more difficult it is to identify research that results in a gain of function!

Gain-of-function research has been in the news recently because there are a group of conspiracy theorists who accuse the scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology of conducting gain-of-function research on bat caronaviruses leading to the creation of SARS-CoV-2 which then escaped from the lab to cause the pandemic. Some of these conspiracy theorists even accuse the American NIH of funding this gain-of-function research.

How do you define gain-of-function research in a meaningful manner? That's the question posed by Amber Dance in a recent Nature article. (Amber Dance is a freelance science journalist.) The first reference below is the title and subtitle of the article that was published in the magazine and the second reference is the online version.

Dance, A. (2021) The Truth About Gain-of-Function Research: Granting new abilities to pathogenic microbes sounds dangerous, but what has the research told us? Nature 598: 554-555. [doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-02903-x]

Dance, A. (2021) The shifting sands of ‘gain-of-function’ research: The mystery of COVID’s origins has reignited a contentious debate about potentially risky studies and the fuzzy terminology that describes them. Nature 598: 554-555. [Nature website]

The only relevant gain-of-function research is the type specified by NIH as "gain-of-function research of concern" (GOFROC). This is research that makes a potential pathogen more likely to cause disease in humans. This is the kind of research that would be carried out in a lab devoted to biological warfare but it could also apply to some research that was carried out in the past, as described in the article. There is no evidence to support the accusation that scientists in China, or anywhere else, were doing such research on coronaviruses.

There are other kinds of research that involve constructing chimeric viruses in order to test whether they have the potential to cause a pandemic. This is perfectly normal, even necessary, research but conspiracy theorists have claimed that this is forbidden gain-of-function research. The article does a good job of explaining this research and why it's not a problem.


Image Credits: The coronavirus figure is from Alexy Solodovnikov and Wikmedia Commons.

5 comments :

  1. Gain of function is like pornography - one knows it when one sees it. I tried to explain to my non-biologist friends that practically any mutant screen is a gain of function research but I ultimately failed. Everyone is convinced that there is good and bad screening and it's always possible to tell one from another.

    ReplyDelete

  2. https://theintercept.com/2021/09/09/covid-origins-gain-of-function-research/
    "DOCUMENTS OBTAINED BY The Intercept contain new evidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the nearby Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment, along with their collaborator, the U.S.-based nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance, have engaged in what the U.S. government defines as “gain-of-function research of concern,” intentionally making viruses more pathogenic or transmissible in order to study them, despite stipulations from a U.S. funding agency that the money not be used for that purpose."
    https://theintercept.com/2021/09/09/covid-origins-gain-of-function-research/

    Is this now a conspiracy theory or a conspiracy fact?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Like the NIH you said? You mean EXACTLY like what was found in NIH documents?
    https://theintercept.com/2021/10/21/virus-mers-wuhan-experiments/

    According to your own definition gain of function research was conducted on coronavirus...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you for sharing this valuable information.

    Apparrant is the leading UX UI Design agency having experienced designers and developers working throughout the year on important and life changing products. We have been awarded as top UI UX Design agency in India by multiple agencies. If you are looking for best UX Design Agency in Noida, UI UX Design Agency in Faridabad, and UX UI Design Company in Delhi then Apparrant is best for you.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nice Information. I really liked it and admire you for posting it on the internet for the benefit of a larger Audience.

    If you are looking for best App design and development company in Noida, Delhi NCR, Gurgaon, Faridabad and India then Apparrant is Awesome. We have been known as leading Mobile and web application development company in Noida, India. Work of Apparrant can be checked on our website along with the processes we follow in to the web or App design and technologies we use at Apparrant.

    ReplyDelete