Sandwalk: Who Do Canadians Trust?

Thursday, July 09, 2009

Who Do Canadians Trust?

Harris/Decima conducted a poll of almost 1200 English-speaking Canadian adults on behalf of Reader's Digest [The Canadians You Trust. Each respondent was given a list of 100 names and photos of prominent Canadians and they were asked to choose the person they trusted the most.

Here's the top ten. The number one most trusted Canadian is a scientist! The rest of the list is pretty impressive. I would probably have picked some of them myself, especially Rick Hillier and Stephen Lewis. I would not have picked #8.

I had to look up #9—she's the Auditor General of Canada.

David Suzuki
The Queen, Elizabeth II
Gen. Rick Hillier (Ret'd)
Stephen Lewis
Michael J. Fox
Lloyd Robertson
Peter Mansbridge
Stehpen Harper
Sheila Fraser
Rick Mercer

6 comments :

Bayesian Bouffant, FCD said...: Dudley Do-Right didn't make the list?; Thursday, July 09, 2009 8:52:00 AM
Carlo said...: Whilst David Suzuki is respected for his former scientific contributions, I'm not sure that I'd trust his 'science' after having read The Sacred Balance. The Nature of Things IS the reason I became a biologist though, so he deserves a lot of my respect. The Queen though, that one I don't get. I guess the question I have is 'Trust in regards to what?'; Thursday, July 09, 2009 10:55:00 AM
Mike said...: I agree with Carlo re: David Suzuki. Some of the things that I've heard him say about the responsibilities of scientists (i.e. scientists are responsible for the societal outcomes of their work), are deeply troubling.

He's raised awareness for environmental issues, which is great, but he's not perfect.; Thursday, July 09, 2009 10:59:00 AM
Unknown said...: Suzuki's organization used to buy advertising space in the Toronto subway. It would take about ten seconds to spot various misleading statistics and/or outright errors. Free propaganda for the skeptics.

His heart may be in the right place, but he (or his organization) will lie to you to get you to do the "right" thing.

As to "The Nature of Things", it was a much better show under Lister Sinclair.; Thursday, July 09, 2009 12:40:00 PM
Anonymous said...: I used to respect scientists, until I started reading guys like Moran, PZ, and Coyne. Their public persona has little to do with science (can PZ show me some of his best discoveries or papers?), and more to do with bashing religion. That's their real career, and they do everything they can to promote it. They're journalists, not real scientists. What new discoveries do they make? Do they contribute anything new to our understanding of the world? Not much...; Saturday, July 11, 2009 11:14:00 PM
Larry Moran said...: Anonymous says,

They're journalists, not real scientists.

Oh dear, now you've pissed off the journalists as well.; Sunday, July 12, 2009 7:11:00 AM

Quotations

The old argument of design in nature, as given by Paley, which formerly seemed to me to be so conclusive, fails, now that the law of natural selection has been discovered. We can no longer argue that, for instance, the beautiful hinge of a bivalve shell must have been made by an intelligent being, like the hinge of a door by man. There seems to be no more design in the variability of organic beings and in the action of natural selection, than in the course which the wind blows.Charles Darwin (c1880)

Although I am fully convinced of the truth of the views given in this volume, I by no means expect to convince experienced naturalists whose minds are stocked with a multitude of facts all viewed, during a long course of years, from a point of view directly opposite to mine. It is so easy to hide our ignorance under such expressions as "plan of creation," "unity of design," etc., and to think that we give an explanation when we only restate a fact. Any one whose disposition leads him to attach more weight to unexplained difficulties than to the explanation of a certain number of facts will certainly reject the theory.

Charles Darwin (1859)

Science reveals where religion conceals. Where religion purports to explain, it actually resorts to tautology. To assert that "God did it" is no more than an admission of ignorance dressed deceitfully as an explanation...

Peter Atkins

Quotations

The world is not inhabited exclusively by fools, and when a subject arouses intense interest, as this one has, something other than semantics is usually at stake. Stephen Jay Gould (1982)
I have championed contingency, and will continue to do so, because its large realm and legitimate claims have been so poorly attended by evolutionary scientists who cannot discern the beat of this different drummer while their brains and ears remain tuned to only the sounds of general theory. Stephen Jay Gould (2002) p.1339
The essence of Darwinism lies in its claim that natural selection creates the fit. Variation is ubiquitous and random in direction. It supplies raw material only. Natural selection directs the course of evolutionary change. Stephen Jay Gould (1977)
Rudyard Kipling asked how the leopard got its spots, the rhino its wrinkled skin. He called his answers "just-so stories." When evolutionists try to explain form and behavior, they also tell just-so stories—and the agent is natural selection. Virtuosity in invention replaces testability as the criterion for acceptance. Stephen Jay Gould (1980)
Since 'change of gene frequencies in populations' is the 'official' definition of evolution, randomness has transgressed Darwin's border and asserted itself as an agent of evolutionary change. Stephen Jay Gould (1983) p.335
The first commandment for all versions of NOMA might be summarized by stating: "Thou shalt not mix the magisteria by claiming that God directly ordains important events in the history of nature by special interference knowable only through revelation and not accessible to science." In common parlance, we refer to such special interference as "miracle"—operationally defined as a unique and temporary suspension of natural law to reorder the facts of nature by divine fiat. Stephen Jay Gould (1999) p.84

Quotations

My own view is that conclusions about the evolution of human behavior should be based on research at least as rigorous as that used in studying nonhuman animals. And if you read the animal behavior journals, you'll see that this requirement sets the bar pretty high, so that many assertions about evolutionary psychology sink without a trace.

Jerry Coyne
Why Evolution Is True

I once made the remark that two things disappeared in 1990: one was communism, the other was biochemistry and that only one of them should be allowed to come back.

Sydney Brenner
TIBS Dec. 2000

It is naïve to think that if a species' environment changes the species must adapt or else become extinct.... Just as a changed environment need not set in motion selection for new adaptations, new adaptations may evolve in an unchanging environment if new mutations arise that are superior to any pre-existing variations

Douglas Futuyma

One of the most frightening things in the Western world, and in this country in particular, is the number of people who believe in things that are scientifically false. If someone tells me that the earth is less than 10,000 years old, in my opinion he should see a psychiatrist.

Francis Crick

There will be no difficulty in computers being adapted to biology. There will be luddites. But they will be buried.

Sydney Brenner

An atheist before Darwin could have said, following Hume: 'I have no explanation for complex biological design. All I know is that God isn't a good explanation, so we must wait and hope that somebody comes up with a better one.' I can't help feeling that such a position, though logically sound, would have left one feeling pretty unsatisfied, and that although atheism might have been logically tenable before Darwin, Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist

Richard Dawkins

Another curious aspect of the theory of evolution is that everybody thinks he understand it. I mean philosophers, social scientists, and so on. While in fact very few people understand it, actually as it stands, even as it stood when Darwin expressed it, and even less as we now may be able to understand it in biology.

Jacques Monod

The false view of evolution as a process of global optimizing has been applied literally by engineers who, taken in by a mistaken metaphor, have attempted to find globally optimal solutions to design problems by writing programs that model evolution by natural selection.

Richard Lewontin

More Recent Comments

Thursday, July 09, 2009

Who Do Canadians Trust?

6 comments :