Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Strolling with a skeptical biochemist
Posted by
Laurence A. Moran
at
4:41 PM
Labels: Humor, Rationalism v Superstition
The old argument of design in nature, as given by Paley, which formerly
seemed to me to be so conclusive, fails, now that the law of natural selection has been discovered. We can no longer argue that, for instance, the beautiful hinge of a bivalve shell must have been made by an intelligent being, like the hinge of a door by man. There seems to be no more design in the variability of organic beings and in the action of natural selection, than in the course which the wind blows.
The world is not inhabited exclusively by fools, and when a subject arouses intense interest, as this one has, something other than semantics is usually at stake.
Stephen Jay Gould (1982)I have championed contingency, and will continue to do so, because its large realm and legitimate claims have been so poorly attended by evolutionary scientists who cannot discern the beat of this different drummer while their brains and ears remain tuned to only the sounds of general theory.
Stephen Jay Gould (2002) p.1339The essence of Darwinism lies in its claim that natural selection creates the fit. Variation is ubiquitous and random in direction. It supplies raw material only. Natural selection directs the course of evolutionary change.
Stephen Jay Gould (1977)Rudyard Kipling asked how the leopard got its spots, the rhino its wrinkled skin. He called his answers "just-so stories." When evolutionists try to explain form and behavior, they also tell just-so stories—and the agent is natural selection. Virtuosity in invention replaces testability as the criterion for acceptance.
Stephen Jay Gould (1980)Since 'change of gene frequencies in populations' is the 'official' definition of evolution, randomness has transgressed Darwin's border and asserted itself as an agent of evolutionary change.
Stephen Jay Gould (1983) p.335The first commandment for all versions of NOMA might be summarized by stating: "Thou shalt not mix the magisteria by claiming that God directly ordains important events in the history of nature by special interference knowable only through revelation and not accessible to science." In common parlance, we refer to such special interference as "miracle"—operationally defined as a unique and temporary suspension of natural law to reorder the facts of nature by divine fiat.
Stephen Jay Gould (1999) p.84
I'm thinking a religion whose emblem is a cross, we should not be surprised were God to put pain and suffering in the way of life.
ReplyDeleteIt seems this is a distinctive in Christianity, that it out of all religions, embraces pain, and in a sane way.
"Does Job fear God for nothing?" Satan replied. "Have you not put a hedge around him and his household and everything he has? You have blessed the work of his hands, so that his flocks and herds are spread throughout the land. But stretch out your hand and strike everything he has, and he will surely curse you to your face."
(Job 1:9-11)
For one thing, that question needs to be answered.
As a fellow atheist, I agree with the logic of the example. (It's also quite clever.)
ReplyDeleteMy wife is quite religious. She doesn't push it on me or anyone else. (We are both academics, and she realizes that she is in a small minority.) But she feels bad when people take this sort of cheap shot at something that's important to her.
When we first met, I would make this sort of comment. But I don't any more. What's the point? It only makes her feel bad.
Further, although most people of religion probably won't agree with me I suspect that most of the intelligent people who are religious don't think at that level. They are more concerned about subjective experience.
It's really quite amazing to be alive—and even more so to experience the world, to have an inner life. It seems to me that the real foundation of religion is the wonder at that inner life, the wonder of subjective experience.
Furthermore, this isn't a God of the Gaps. No matter how much we learn about how consciousness comes about—and I expect that we will fully understand it eventually—I suspect that the phenomenon of subjective experience won't ever cease to be amazing.
Let me say that I use the dissident philosophy forum and the idiot who does these stupid comments ^^ is in no way representative of the community.
ReplyDelete