Read all about the speculation concerning our aquatic ancestry in an impressively researched article by laelaps [
Scuttling the Aquatic Ape Hypothesis]. This is a typical adaptationist
just-so story. Even people who should know better, like Daniel Dennett, have fallen for it.
Thanks for the link, Larry. I had heard that Dennett had favored the AAH, although I wasn't sure. That's something else I'll have to look into when I get the chance and I'll update what I wrote accordingly.
ReplyDeleteHumans aren't the most aquatic apes?
ReplyDeleteHi all,
ReplyDeleteThere are now some recent publications on the Littoral Theory (commonly known as AAT) that Pleistocene Homo populations colonised different continents & islands (even Flores >19 km oversea >800 ka) along the coasts & from there inland along the rivers, where they collected aquatic & waterside foods, including shellfish, seaweeds, ungulates drowned or caught in mud or shallow water, stranded whales, cattails, cane etc., eg,
- M Vaneechoutte, A Kuliukas & M Verhaegen eds 2011 ebook Bentham Sci Publ (with contributions of prof.Tobias, Elaine Morgan, myself etc.) “Was Man More Aquatic in the Past? Fifty Years after Alister Hardy: Waterside Hypotheses of Human Evolution”
- M Verhaegen & S Munro 2011 HOMO, J compar hum Biol 62:237-247 “Pachyosteosclerosis suggests archaic Homo frequently collected sessile littoral foods”
For more info, please google “econiche homo”, “aquarboreal”, “pachyosteosclerosis”, or send me an email.