ChatGPT won't pass my exams!

Here are a few questions for ChatGPT and its answers. The AI program takes the most common information on the web and spews it back at you. It cannot tell which information is correct or which information is more accurate.

It's easy to recognize that these answers were written by something that's not very good at critical thinking. I agree with other professors that they mimic typical undergraduate answers but I disagree that these answers would get them a passing grade.

ChatGPT shares one very important feature that's common in undergraduate answers to essay questions: it gives you lots of unecessary information that's not directly relevant to the question.

It's important to note that (lol) these ChatGPT answers share another important feature with many of the answers on my exams: they look very much like BS!

Q. What is the best hypothesis on the origin of life?

A. The origin of life is a topic of ongoing scientific investigation and debate. One of the most widely accepted hypotheses is the "abiogenesis" or "primordial soup" theory, which proposes that life on Earth originated from simple organic molecules that eventually formed more complex structures through chemical reactions. The "RNA world" hypothesis is another popular theory which suggests that RNA, a molecule that can both store genetic information and catalyze chemical reactions, was the first self-replicating molecule that gave rise to life.

Another theory is Panspermia, which proposes that life on Earth was brought here by comets or meteorites.

It's important to note that the exact origin of life is still not known and it may be a combination of all theories. Scientists are still conducting research to test and refine these hypotheses, and new discoveries may lead to a better understanding of how life on Earth began.

Q. What is nearly neutral theory?

A. The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution is a theory that proposes that most genetic changes in a population are the result of genetic drift rather than natural selection. According to this theory, most genetic variations in a population are selectively neutral, meaning that they do not affect the fitness of the organism. The nearly neutral theory suggests that these neutral mutations can accumulate over time and eventually lead to genetic diversity and speciation.

This theory is developed by Motoo Kimura in 1968, and it predicts that the majority of genetic variation in a population is found in non-coding regions of the genome, rather than in coding regions that are under selection.

This theory is also supported by the fact that the synonymous mutations of protein coding genes should not affect the fitness of the organism and hence accumulate by genetic drift.

It's important to note that this theory doesn't deny the role of natural selection in shaping the genome but rather emphasizes the importance of genetic drift in shaping genome evolution.

Q. Explain bacterial photosynthesis.

A. Bacterial photosynthesis is the process by which certain types of bacteria convert light energy into chemical energy in the form of organic compounds. This process is similar to the photosynthesis that occurs in plants and algae, but there are some important differences.

The main types of bacteria that perform photosynthesis are purple bacteria and green sulfur bacteria. Purple bacteria are photosynthetic bacteria that use a pigment called bacteriochlorophyll to absorb light. Green sulfur bacteria use a different pigment called chlorosomes.

Both types of bacteria use light-dependent reactions to convert light energy into chemical energy. In the light-dependent reactions, light is absorbed by the pigments, which excite electrons and transfer them to an electron transport chain. This transfer of electrons generates a proton gradient across the thylakoid membrane, which is used to produce ATP and NADPH, two molecules that store chemical energy.

In the second step, the light-independent reactions or the dark reactions, the bacteria uses the energy stored in the ATP and NADPH to fix CO2 into organic compounds, such as glucose, through the process of carbon fixation.

It's important to note that not all photosynthetic bacteria are oxygenic, meaning they don't produce oxygen as byproduct. Some anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria use alternative electron acceptors such as sulfur, nitrate or metal ions, instead of oxygen.

Q. How common is alternative splicing?

A. Alternative splicing is a process by which different variants of a single gene, called exons, are selectively included or excluded from the final mRNA product. This process allows a single gene to give rise to multiple different protein isoforms. Alternative splicing is a widespread and evolutionarily conserved mechanism in eukaryotic organisms, including animals, plants, and fungi.

According to studies, it is estimated that up to 90% of human genes undergo alternative splicing. In some cases, alternative splicing can result in small variations in protein structure, while in other cases it can lead to entirely different proteins with different functions.

Alternative splicing also allows cells to quickly and efficiently generate a large number of different proteins from a relatively small number of genes, which is thought to be a key factor in the complexity of eukaryotic organisms.

It's important to note that the rate of alternative splicing can vary greatly between different organisms and even between different tissues within the same organism. Also, the degree of complexity of alternative splicing can vary greatly between different genes, with some genes showing only a few different isoforms, while others can give rise to dozens or even hundreds of different isoforms.

Q. Describe the correct view of the central dogma of molecular biology.

A. The central dogma of molecular biology is the fundamental principle that describes the flow of genetic information within a biological system. It states that DNA is transcribed into RNA, which is then translated into proteins. The central dogma is often described as a one-way flow of information, from DNA to RNA to protein, and it is considered the foundation of modern molecular biology.

The central dogma can be broken down into three main steps:

Transcription: During transcription, a specific section of DNA is copied into a molecule of RNA. This process is catalyzed by an enzyme called RNA polymerase. The RNA molecule that is produced during transcription is called a primary transcript, and it contains all the genetic information needed to make a protein.

Translation: The primary transcript is then translated into a protein. The translation process takes place on ribosomes, which are the cell's protein-making factories. The primary transcript is read in groups of three nucleotides, called codons, which correspond to specific amino acids. The sequence of amino acids that is produced during translation determines the final structure and function of the protein.

Regulating the central dogma: The central dogma is not strictly one-way process, it can also be regulated by multiple mechanisms such as RNA processing, post-transcriptional modifications, alternative splicing, non-coding RNAs, and miRNA. These mechanisms can affect the stability, localization, and translation of the RNA molecule and can lead to the production of different protein isoforms from the same gene.

It's important to note that the central dogma is a theoretical model and it doesn't account for all the molecular mechanisms that occur in a biological system. For example, the process of reverse transcription, where RNA is converted into DNA, is not considered in the central dogma.

Q. Which pathway is more primitive; glycolysis or gluconeogenesis?

A. Glycolysis and gluconeogenesis are two metabolic pathways that are related, but have opposite functions. Glycolysis is the metabolic pathway that breaks down glucose to produce energy and other metabolic intermediates, while gluconeogenesis is the pathway that synthesizes glucose from non-carbohydrate precursors such as amino acids, lactate, and glycerol.

It's difficult to say which pathway is more primitive. Both pathways have ancient origins, and they have likely evolved in parallel. It's likely that the earliest forms of life relied on simple metabolic pathways such as glycolysis to obtain energy from simple sugars, and that gluconeogenesis evolved later as a way to generate energy from non-carbohydrate sources.

It's also important to note that both pathways are vital for different organisms at different stages of their life cycle. For example, glycolysis is more active in organisms that rely on fermentation to generate ATP, such as yeast, while gluconeogenesis is more active in organisms that rely on respiration for energy, such as mammals.

In summary, both glycolysis and gluconeogenesis are ancient and evolutionarily conserved pathways that have different functions but both are important for life.

Q. If glycolysis evolved before gluconeogenesis, then where did primitive organisms get their glucose?

A. It is believed that primitive organisms likely obtained glucose and other simple sugars from their environment, such as from the breakdown of organic matter or from the absorption of simple sugars from the surrounding water. Some ancient organisms may have also produced their own glucose through the process of photosynthesis. The earliest forms of photosynthesis likely produced simple sugars like glucose and not the more complex sugars we find in modern photosynthetic organisms.

The ability to perform glycolysis predates the evolution of gluconeogenesis as a metabolic pathway. The reason for this is that glycolysis is a relatively simple pathway that can generate energy from small amounts of glucose, even in the absence of oxygen. This would have been an important adaptation for ancient organisms that lived in environments with limited or fluctuating oxygen levels. In contrast, gluconeogenesis is a more complex pathway that requires a greater investment of energy and resources to generate glucose from non-carbohydrate precursors, so it may have evolved later, as organisms adapted to new environments or developed new metabolic needs.

It's important to note that the origins of these pathways are still not well understood and different theories have been proposed. The idea that glycolysis came before gluconeogenesis is a widely accepted theory, but it's important to keep in mind that the origins of metabolic pathways are complex and multi-faceted and research is ongoing in this area.

---