Sandwalk: Should Christians Be Armed?

Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Should Christians Be Armed?

While checking out Pat Boone's IDiotic statements about evolution [Charles Darwin's Funny Joke] I noticed this icon in the sidebar. Naturally I couldn't resist clicking on it.

I ended up at a site advertising the book Shooting Back. Here's what I read,

What would you do if armed terrorists broke into your church and starting attacking your friends with automatic weapons in the middle of a worship service?

Would you be prepared to defend yourself and other innocents?

Would you be justified in doing so?

Is it time for Americans to consider such once-unthinkable possibilities?

There is one man in the world who can address these questions with first-hand experience.

His name is Charl van Wyck – a South African who was faced with just such a shocking scenario.

In "Shooting Back: The Right and Duty of Self-Defense," van Wyk makes a biblical, Christian case for individuals arming themselves with guns, and does so more persuasively than perhaps any other author because he found himself in a church attacked by terrorists.

Wow! That's all we need. IDiots with guns. In church.

Don't you just love America?

8 comments :

Torbjörn Larsson said...: This comment has been removed by the author.; Thursday, February 01, 2007 3:31:00 AM
Anonymous said...: How many of your friends have been gunned down?. I have ten South African friends that have been murdered.South Africa is as violent a place as Iraq.; Thursday, February 01, 2007 3:32:00 AM
Torbjörn Larsson said...: If their gods would have wanted worshipers to carry guns, they should have started the universe with fireworks. Eh, wait, ..., so it did. But seriously, the "christ" in christians stands for NT stuff that tried to wrest that religion away from the OT "an eye for an eye" and "make war" to "turn the other cheek" and "make sacrifices". And Martin Luther King (or Gandhi) showed that it worked in certain situations. They don't even try - what is wrong with these guys?

While I'm not keen on unnecessary regulation, gun licenses with shooting practice and range limitations isn't it. More guns, more violence - the causation is proved long since. (I'm also quite happy with not having to see a lot of different police and paramilitary forces moving around in the society, each flaunting heavy guns. But that is a different gun problem.)

T:
Well, the book isn't arguing to South African's, is it? In an unruly society where gun laws can't be enforced, it is different. And that difference is part of the problem here.; Thursday, February 01, 2007 3:44:00 AM
Anonymous said...: What would you do if armed terrorists broke into your church and starting attacking your friends with automatic weapons in the middle of a worship service?

Is this multiple choice? I think the correct answer is "Turn the other cheek. After all, an immediate freed ride to Heaven is quite a gift for these terrorists to give you. You should be grateful. Right?; Thursday, February 01, 2007 11:58:00 AM
Steve LaBonne said...: Love America? I don't even frigging recognize it anymore...; Thursday, February 01, 2007 1:48:00 PM
O'Brien said...: Love America? I don't even frigging recognize it anymore...

Perhaps you should spend less time around the fume hood, Gil.; Thursday, February 01, 2007 8:13:00 PM
Anonymous said...: I spent a good part of the years 1989-94 in Canada (mostly Edmonton, a bit in Calgary), so I know this is kind of difficult for folks North of the Border to imagine, but for many Americans (definitely not me), give 'em a gun and they *are* in church, i.e., having a religious experience.; Friday, February 02, 2007 7:29:00 AM
Steve LaBonne said...: For example, people as disturbed as RO'B used to be cared for in places where they wouldn't harm themselves or others.; Friday, February 02, 2007 8:35:00 AM

Quotations

The old argument of design in nature, as given by Paley, which formerly seemed to me to be so conclusive, fails, now that the law of natural selection has been discovered. We can no longer argue that, for instance, the beautiful hinge of a bivalve shell must have been made by an intelligent being, like the hinge of a door by man. There seems to be no more design in the variability of organic beings and in the action of natural selection, than in the course which the wind blows.Charles Darwin (c1880)

Although I am fully convinced of the truth of the views given in this volume, I by no means expect to convince experienced naturalists whose minds are stocked with a multitude of facts all viewed, during a long course of years, from a point of view directly opposite to mine. It is so easy to hide our ignorance under such expressions as "plan of creation," "unity of design," etc., and to think that we give an explanation when we only restate a fact. Any one whose disposition leads him to attach more weight to unexplained difficulties than to the explanation of a certain number of facts will certainly reject the theory.

Charles Darwin (1859)

Science reveals where religion conceals. Where religion purports to explain, it actually resorts to tautology. To assert that "God did it" is no more than an admission of ignorance dressed deceitfully as an explanation...

Peter Atkins

Quotations

The world is not inhabited exclusively by fools, and when a subject arouses intense interest, as this one has, something other than semantics is usually at stake. Stephen Jay Gould (1982)
I have championed contingency, and will continue to do so, because its large realm and legitimate claims have been so poorly attended by evolutionary scientists who cannot discern the beat of this different drummer while their brains and ears remain tuned to only the sounds of general theory. Stephen Jay Gould (2002) p.1339
The essence of Darwinism lies in its claim that natural selection creates the fit. Variation is ubiquitous and random in direction. It supplies raw material only. Natural selection directs the course of evolutionary change. Stephen Jay Gould (1977)
Rudyard Kipling asked how the leopard got its spots, the rhino its wrinkled skin. He called his answers "just-so stories." When evolutionists try to explain form and behavior, they also tell just-so stories—and the agent is natural selection. Virtuosity in invention replaces testability as the criterion for acceptance. Stephen Jay Gould (1980)
Since 'change of gene frequencies in populations' is the 'official' definition of evolution, randomness has transgressed Darwin's border and asserted itself as an agent of evolutionary change. Stephen Jay Gould (1983) p.335
The first commandment for all versions of NOMA might be summarized by stating: "Thou shalt not mix the magisteria by claiming that God directly ordains important events in the history of nature by special interference knowable only through revelation and not accessible to science." In common parlance, we refer to such special interference as "miracle"—operationally defined as a unique and temporary suspension of natural law to reorder the facts of nature by divine fiat. Stephen Jay Gould (1999) p.84

Quotations

My own view is that conclusions about the evolution of human behavior should be based on research at least as rigorous as that used in studying nonhuman animals. And if you read the animal behavior journals, you'll see that this requirement sets the bar pretty high, so that many assertions about evolutionary psychology sink without a trace.

Jerry Coyne
Why Evolution Is True

I once made the remark that two things disappeared in 1990: one was communism, the other was biochemistry and that only one of them should be allowed to come back.

Sydney Brenner
TIBS Dec. 2000

It is naïve to think that if a species' environment changes the species must adapt or else become extinct.... Just as a changed environment need not set in motion selection for new adaptations, new adaptations may evolve in an unchanging environment if new mutations arise that are superior to any pre-existing variations

Douglas Futuyma

One of the most frightening things in the Western world, and in this country in particular, is the number of people who believe in things that are scientifically false. If someone tells me that the earth is less than 10,000 years old, in my opinion he should see a psychiatrist.

Francis Crick

There will be no difficulty in computers being adapted to biology. There will be luddites. But they will be buried.

Sydney Brenner

An atheist before Darwin could have said, following Hume: 'I have no explanation for complex biological design. All I know is that God isn't a good explanation, so we must wait and hope that somebody comes up with a better one.' I can't help feeling that such a position, though logically sound, would have left one feeling pretty unsatisfied, and that although atheism might have been logically tenable before Darwin, Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist

Richard Dawkins

Another curious aspect of the theory of evolution is that everybody thinks he understand it. I mean philosophers, social scientists, and so on. While in fact very few people understand it, actually as it stands, even as it stood when Darwin expressed it, and even less as we now may be able to understand it in biology.

Jacques Monod

The false view of evolution as a process of global optimizing has been applied literally by engineers who, taken in by a mistaken metaphor, have attempted to find globally optimal solutions to design problems by writing programs that model evolution by natural selection.

Richard Lewontin

More Recent Comments

Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Should Christians Be Armed?

8 comments :