My meta-vote on the change in answers to this second poll compared to the first is: it's now easy to find a recent post that summarizes how much of a human genome is almost certainly junk and how much is clearly functional. If you can do basic arithmatic, you can vote in this poll based on the evidence.
It looks like one side is wining.
ReplyDeleteOr the structure of your readership is changing.
My meta-vote on the change in answers to this second poll compared to the first is: it's now easy to find a recent post that summarizes how much of a human genome is almost certainly junk and how much is clearly functional. If you can do basic arithmatic, you can vote in this poll based on the evidence.
ReplyDeleteSo far it seems that 2/3 of respondents believe Larry is wrong.
ReplyDeleteOf course, this is a "junk" poll that is completely unscientific.
@Atheistoclast - what percentage think you're wrong?
ReplyDeleteI don't think it makes any claim to be 'science', either way.