The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has a Programme for International Student Assessmant (PISA).
The first study was carried out in 2000 and it tested for reading ability. Canada ranked fourth in that survey, behind Korea, Finland, and Hong Kong–China.
The second study in 2003 measured mathematical ability and Canada was fifth. Only Chinese Taipei, Finland, Korea, and Hong Kong–China did better.
The 2006 study evaluated scientific literacy. Over 22,000 15-year-old Canadian students from more than 1,000 schools took part in the test. Canadian students ranked in third place behind Finland and Hong Kong-China. The chart (above, left) shows all countries that ranked significantly above the OECD average. The chart below lists some of the countries that were below average. In total, more than 400,000 students from 57 countries took the test.
The PISA study defined scientific literacy as ...
... an individual’s capacity to use scientific knowledge, to identify questions, and to draw evidence-based conclusions in order to understand and help make decisions about the natural world and the changes made to it through human activity.Science competency was evaluated through a series of questions designed to elicit information on ...
1. Identifying scientific issues required students to recognize issues that can be explored scientifically and the key features of scientific investigation.Students were assessed on two different kinds of scientific literacy ...
2. Explaining phenomena scientifically involved the application of the knowledge of science to describe or interpret phenomena scientifically and predict changes.
3. Using scientific evidence meant interpreting the evidence to draw conclusions; to explain them; to identify the assumptions, evidence, and reasoning that underpin them; and to reflect on their implications.
Knowledge of science. This entailed an understanding of fundamental scientific concepts and theories, in core scientific areas. The four content areas covered were “Physical systems,” “Living systems,” “Earth and space systems,” and “Technological systems,” representing key aspects of understanding the natural world.The complete Canadian Report can be found on the Council of Ministers of Education website. There's much more information about other countries on the PISA website.
Knowledge about science. This included understanding the purposes and nature of scientific enquiry and understanding scientific explanations, which are the results of scientific enquiry.
In general, the study looks very good. The questions are excellent and the analysis seems scholarly and well-reasoned. There are no great surprises. Student performance is correlated with school funding levels and socio-economic level.
I thought Norway (my country) had about the same funding as the other Nordic countries and Canada. I'm a bit saddened to see us that far down.
ReplyDelete