Well this is coice for me, tol eave a comment at the site of a biochemist who features Darwin, and a video of James Randi turning his nose up at homeopathy with Richard Dawkins. Now that we have Darwin's letters online, it has been discovered that Darwin not only was cured of a serious condition by it, but that he created a biochemical proving for it, using dropsera rotundiflora and a high dilute of ammonia salts. I have found it consistently to be the case of "skeptics" that they overreach their doubts with little grasp of the subjects they pillory. Unlike Darwin, they pretend at science, refuseto get their hands dirty with experimentation while they dismiss, deny and denigrate. John Benneth
Well this is coice for me, tol eave a comment at the site of a biochemist who features Darwin, and a video of James Randi turning his nose up at homeopathy with Richard Dawkins. Now that we have Darwin's letters online, it has been discovered that Darwin not only was cured of a serious condition by it, but that he created a biochemical proving for it, using dropsera rotundiflora and a high dilute of ammonia salts. I have found it consistently to be the case of "skeptics" that they overreach their doubts with little grasp of the subjects they pillory. Unlike Darwin, they pretend at science, refuseto get their hands dirty with experimentation while they dismiss, deny and denigrate.
ReplyDeleteJohn Benneth