tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post9168918640656078798..comments2024-03-27T14:50:47.345-04:00Comments on <center>Sandwalk</center>: James Shapiro Never LearnsLarry Moranhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05756598746605455848noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-62213738226731546332012-12-08T13:41:29.377-05:002012-12-08T13:41:29.377-05:00Hei Steve, still doing a lot of "spinning&quo...Hei Steve, still doing a lot of "spinning", I see.Pedronoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-46441857902601394042012-12-08T12:23:58.511-05:002012-12-08T12:23:58.511-05:00Many of us have been invited to contribute to Huff...Many of us have been invited to contribute to Huffington Post. I'm certain that Jerry Coyne has also been asked. <br /><br />Huffington Post is more than happy to publish controversial articles that will attract readers. Unfortunately, they aren't as happy to actually pay for those articles. <br /><br />For those of us who have turned down Huffington Post, "jealous" is not the appropriate word to describe how we feel about those who accept. Larry Moranhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05756598746605455848noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-73222568198749839162012-12-08T09:38:16.649-05:002012-12-08T09:38:16.649-05:00Poor Larry's jealous Shapiro's got his own...Poor Larry's jealous Shapiro's got his own HP column!<br /><br />James is chippin' away and Larry and Jerry go sneering away!<br /><br />Fitting contrast.Stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15246115342112568778noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-44037507348118403482012-12-07T07:37:52.250-05:002012-12-07T07:37:52.250-05:00Jerry Coyne has a very good take down of Shapiro o...Jerry Coyne has a very good take down of Shapiro on http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/page/2/ Much more interesting and to the point than definitions of genes IMHOAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-60996160954445889502012-12-06T20:40:28.861-05:002012-12-06T20:40:28.861-05:00No, I think Pépé is correct. Shapiro is to Darwin...No, I think Pépé is correct. Shapiro is to Darwin as <a href="http://www.waynenewton.com/" rel="nofollow">(Wayne) Newton</a> is to Copernicus.<br />.Joe Felsensteinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06359126552631140000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-68982629165425012602012-12-06T19:56:18.062-05:002012-12-06T19:56:18.062-05:00"They laughed at Galileo. They laughed at New..."They laughed at Galileo. They laughed at Newton. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown." - Carl Sagan.steve oberskinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-57644024051129475852012-12-06T17:22:59.690-05:002012-12-06T17:22:59.690-05:00I think Shapiro is to Darwin what Newton was to Co...I think Shapiro is to Darwin what Newton was to Copernic!<br />Pépéhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00896283600100217146noreply@blogger.com