tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post7057567489483212952..comments2024-03-27T14:50:47.345-04:00Comments on <center>Sandwalk</center>: Breaking News: the IDiots Don't Understand Neutral TheoryLarry Moranhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05756598746605455848noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-31861230835508307612006-12-24T11:09:00.000-05:002006-12-24T11:09:00.000-05:00Dave,
Thanks for spotting the typo. I've corrected...Dave,<br />Thanks for spotting the typo. I've corrected it. Why haven't you corrected your errors?Larry Moranhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05756598746605455848noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-5570587171605125952006-12-24T10:04:00.000-05:002006-12-24T10:04:00.000-05:00Research in Dembski-land?! What on earth are you t...Research in Dembski-land?! What on earth are you talking about?<br /><br />;-)Shalinihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00299736237129391572noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-26109364300705734442006-12-24T07:09:00.000-05:002006-12-24T07:09:00.000-05:00How's the research coming along over there in Demb...How's the research coming along over there in Dembski-land, Dave?Martinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17933545393470431585noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-6711481909353160862006-12-24T05:12:00.000-05:002006-12-24T05:12:00.000-05:00Hey Larry,
Synonomous [sic] is spelt with two y's...Hey Larry,<br /><br />Synonomous [sic] is spelt with two y's in it.<br /><br />ROFLMAO<br /><br />Cheers,<br />DaveDaveScothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03796727784739909570noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-51695986031564193972006-12-23T19:51:00.000-05:002006-12-23T19:51:00.000-05:00As they say, no surprise here, when you wrote: As ...As they say, no surprise here, when you wrote: <i>As usual, the IDiots get confused about the difference between exceptions and generalities.</i> <br /><br />Your post caused me to ask this question: Are these IDiots truly confused or just plain deceptive?<br /><br />The reason I ask this is that I can't recall any other theory or hypothesis in recent history which has been subjected to increasingly intense, incoherent attack as <b>more</b> evidence in support of it is discovered.<br /><br />And it appears to me that those creationists with even a smidgen of intelligence or education go out of their way to twist definitions, data, and discoveries.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com