tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post3528563237952426007..comments2024-03-27T14:50:47.345-04:00Comments on <center>Sandwalk</center>: Lawrence Krauss advocates "teaching doubt"Larry Moranhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05756598746605455848noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-84950029428422421782015-03-17T09:46:10.916-04:002015-03-17T09:46:10.916-04:00@ photosynthesis:
argumentum ad hominem@ photosynthesis:<br />argumentum ad hominemPaulinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10942276886899973371noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-29747546252902127882015-03-17T08:52:49.220-04:002015-03-17T08:52:49.220-04:00Peer,
You're too stupid to understand science...Peer,<br /><br />You're too stupid to understand science. You're simply not qualified. No matter how loudly you make your stance known, it's still fantasy mixed with deep ignorance and an overestimate of your abilities. Sorry to break these news to you, but someone had to do it. You're a self-deceived ignorant imbecile.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-4100109743005116762015-03-17T08:42:07.204-04:002015-03-17T08:42:07.204-04:00There is no need to teach the controversy, simply ...There is no need to teach the controversy, simply teach science. Everybody will then see that IDcreationism of any sort can't stand up to the facts. Mikkel Rumraket Rasmussenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07670550711237457368noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-7851403412705479812015-03-17T08:03:53.218-04:002015-03-17T08:03:53.218-04:00There is no need to teach the controversy, simply ...There is no need to teach the controversy, simply teach science. Everybody will then see that Darwinism cannot stand up to the bio-facts.peerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13511262660273927645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-78774061876903329492015-03-16T16:54:01.244-04:002015-03-16T16:54:01.244-04:00Why would evolution be any challenge for your beli...Why would evolution be any challenge for your beliefs Bobby? All you need is to re-fantasize your beliefs and be done. Your beliefs are mere fantasy, so feel free to add and subtract fantasies as necessary and be happy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-38448634749298888422015-03-16T16:34:44.407-04:002015-03-16T16:34:44.407-04:00"Can't challenge religious beliefs" ..."Can't challenge religious beliefs" . Evolutionism is that challenge. Its the liberal evolutionist crowd that wants the censorship. they attack Christian doctrines and then deny rebuttal. Its the creationist side that wants equal time and so a conversation in front of kids. Its our gain to do so. A loss if it was us in control like in the past.<br />the censorship is illegal and not just immoral and anti intellectual.<br />By the way. The rulers understand better teaching the controversy would lose faith in evolutionism and not in its critics. They are right. They hope ID/YEC wil go away. Its just a wrong calculation that .they are now living with.Robert Byershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05631863870635096770noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-24778715333884930522015-03-16T14:49:45.092-04:002015-03-16T14:49:45.092-04:00I had surrounded my above comment in HTML-like sar...I had surrounded my above comment in HTML-like sarcasm "tags", but blogger stripped them. The above was sarcasm, in case anyone missed that...Bryanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16672407110077541595noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-59854986575319594912015-03-16T14:48:39.341-04:002015-03-16T14:48:39.341-04:00But ID isn't a religious belief, so it is ther...But ID isn't a religious belief, so it is therefore upto this sort of scrutiny without running afoul of the US constitution.<br /><br />Bryanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16672407110077541595noreply@blogger.com