tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post1591862511131328219..comments2024-03-27T14:50:47.345-04:00Comments on <center>Sandwalk</center>: The Evolution ConspiracyLarry Moranhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05756598746605455848noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-32825289691254668572009-04-18T13:22:00.000-04:002009-04-18T13:22:00.000-04:00Mine passed; I was surprisedMine passed; I was surprisedGeorgi Marinovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12226357993389417752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-57799934780827656162009-04-18T10:27:00.000-04:002009-04-18T10:27:00.000-04:00Ha-ha, I posted a comment on her blog seconding La...Ha-ha, I posted a comment on her blog seconding Larry's assessment (took a random paragraph from her book and showed that she can't write a single sentence without making an error). Guess what? Seems like the comment did not pass moderation. How pathetic. Tells something extra about IDiots.DKnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-74578532318636536622009-04-17T22:18:00.000-04:002009-04-17T22:18:00.000-04:00Bayesian Bouffant,
Yeah, I loved that line!
Almo...Bayesian Bouffant,<br /><br />Yeah, I loved that line!<br /><br />Almost as many strands as DNA - which would mean ... one. (I suppose technically it could be as high as three, but I refuse to believe she's heard of quadruplex DNA.)<br /><br />Based on her quoted statements, I can easily see that she might be confused by any concept involving as many as one strand of thought.qetzalnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-15340210446398735502009-04-17T20:47:00.000-04:002009-04-17T20:47:00.000-04:00I saw her website yesterday, after seeing her comm...I saw her website yesterday, after seeing her comment here. <br /><br />I actually see this book as something positive for science. At least it is openly (without admitting it) anti-science and anti-intellectualist and it reveals the true colors of the "other side of the evolution debate". <br /><br />It would be much easier if all anti-evolutionists were as open.Georgi Marinovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12226357993389417752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-13830798914547115172009-04-17T20:46:00.000-04:002009-04-17T20:46:00.000-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Georgi Marinovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12226357993389417752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-81592937446835468132009-04-17T18:32:00.000-04:002009-04-17T18:32:00.000-04:00You misspelled her name. It's "Lisa, A. Shill".You misspelled her name. It's "Lisa, A. Shill".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-75971490264043066372009-04-17T14:45:00.000-04:002009-04-17T14:45:00.000-04:00I think Ms. Shiel would safely reject a book calle...I think Ms. Shiel would safely reject a book called "The Round Earth Conspiracy" that purports to argue for a flat earth, even without reading it. How about a book on Holocaust denial? Would reading it be absolutely necessary to safely assume that its claims were suspect?Wavefunctionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14993805391653267639noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-39461330255050833562009-04-17T12:49:00.000-04:002009-04-17T12:49:00.000-04:00From Lisa's blog: "Unlike other scientists who hav...From Lisa's blog: "Unlike other scientists who have reviewed the book, Moran could determine its accuracy without actually reading the book. Thank you, Professor Moran!"<br /><br />That's right Lisa, when you post samples of work, and said samples contain numerous factual errors, it's pretty safe to conclude that the rest of your writings contain errors as well.jakenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-40684258627179588732009-04-17T12:44:00.000-04:002009-04-17T12:44:00.000-04:00She mentions genetic drift. I like her! And so sho...She mentions genetic drift. I like her! And so should you...Wavefunctionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14993805391653267639noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-8679606153802266372009-04-17T12:29:00.000-04:002009-04-17T12:29:00.000-04:00"a book that presumably explains evolution correct..."a book that presumably explains evolution <B>correctly</B>"<br /><br />Thank you for presuming my book is accurate. Other scientists agree that it is.<br /><br />Have a great day!<br /><br />Lisa A. Shiel<br />author of The Evolution Conspiracy<br /><A HREF="http://evolutionconspiracy.com/" REL="nofollow"> http://EvolutionConspiracy.com/</A>Lisa A. Shielhttp://evolutionconspiracy.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-10281775579944545242009-04-17T11:05:00.000-04:002009-04-17T11:05:00.000-04:00The tuatara’s DNA changes make it the Speedy Gonza...<I>The tuatara’s DNA changes make it the Speedy Gonzales of genetic evolution.</I>The YECs love Speedy Gonzales evolution. It helps to explain how all the "kinds" we see now could have derived from the animals which fit on Noah's ark.Bayesian Bouffant, FCDnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-77703371182136350622009-04-17T11:01:00.000-04:002009-04-17T11:01:00.000-04:00Perhaps the fossilized tuatara aren’t really tuata...<I>Perhaps the fossilized tuatara aren’t really tuatara after all…</I>Perhaps not. Perhaps they are angels, or demons, or unicorns, or some other Biblical beast.Bayesian Bouffant, FCDnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-12600707632194698632009-04-17T11:00:00.000-04:002009-04-17T11:00:00.000-04:00The theory of evolution involves numerous complica...<I>The theory of evolution involves numerous complicated and confounding strands—almost as many strands, I dare say, as DNA itself.</I>Um, two?Bayesian Bouffant, FCDnoreply@blogger.com