tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post7697424428945884133..comments2024-03-27T14:50:47.345-04:00Comments on <center>Sandwalk</center>: Bacterial resistance to antibiotics has nothing to do with evolution according to Michael Egnor MDLarry Moranhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05756598746605455848noreply@blogger.comBlogger107125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-40156517842492081872015-03-05T12:44:44.453-05:002015-03-05T12:44:44.453-05:00Peer Terborg asks,
My point is...why is big-mouth...Peer Terborg asks,<br /><br /><i>My point is...why is big-mouth rude intolereant extremism ... tolerated and encouraged??</i><br /><br />Because I want to give everyone a chance to debate this topic, even the IDiots. That's why I don't ban them in spite of the fact that they are almost always rude and intolerant. <br /><br />I'm much more likely to ban someone who keeps repeating the same thing over and over again in spite of the fact that other people are tying to debate the issue. <br /><br />That's why I'm keeping an eye on you, Peer Terborg. If you don't have anything to contribute then you won't be contributing. <br />Larry Moranhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05756598746605455848noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-5140690946838665932015-03-05T09:52:16.044-05:002015-03-05T09:52:16.044-05:00Because Diogenes knows what he's talking about...Because Diogenes knows what he's talking about and gives cogent arguments to justify his opinions.Athel Cornish-Bowdenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05993242236208061356noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-78957553990444428512015-03-05T09:01:18.293-05:002015-03-05T09:01:18.293-05:00My point is...why is big-mouth rude intolerenat ex...My point is...why is big-mouth rude intolerenat extremism, such as exhibited by the man in the barrel, tolerated and encouraged??<br /><br /> peerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13511262660273927645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-62670781462776038512015-03-04T17:48:35.880-05:002015-03-04T17:48:35.880-05:00Evolution does not have to deal with non-actual ph...<i>Evolution does not have to deal with non-actual phenomena, any more than ID does. How does ID address the matter of boneless chickens?</i><br /><br />They would be irreducibly complex. Obviously a chicken with only half its bones would not be functional.SRMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07299706694667706149noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-777758416204959692015-03-04T16:22:50.639-05:002015-03-04T16:22:50.639-05:00Wouldn't it be hilarious if Diogenes turned ou...Wouldn't it be hilarious if Diogenes turned out to be actually Douglas Theobald and Jon Witton Jonathan Witt from discovery institute? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-22733064589292648162015-03-04T11:11:21.038-05:002015-03-04T11:11:21.038-05:00Don't misunderstand me. I'm open to almost...Don't misunderstand me. I'm open to almost all ideas. I'm sure an intelligent person like you has an explanation why he believes the Earth is 6000 years old<br /><br />I have a feeling we met at conference somewhere but I can't recall where and whenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-51056716530860392062015-03-04T11:05:51.560-05:002015-03-04T11:05:51.560-05:00Peer Tarboro,
Hold on a moment! Are you suggestin...Peer Tarboro,<br /><br />Hold on a moment! Are you suggesting that Diogenes is Douglas Theobald or a post just disappeared the had more info?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-7489048148322791832015-03-04T10:48:03.045-05:002015-03-04T10:48:03.045-05:00And no one else seems bothered by that.
And no one else seems bothered by that. <br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14647952761619665724noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-27386960511501096622015-03-04T10:45:36.911-05:002015-03-04T10:45:36.911-05:00Hm... You just threw it around like it was a fact....Hm... You just threw it around like it was a fact... Can you point out exactly what are those "science fact-discoveries" and why they disprove what Douglas Theobald wrote (exactly which parts if any)? If you don't do it is easy to presume that you're making it up. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14647952761619665724noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-21588568587280522432015-03-04T10:45:10.317-05:002015-03-04T10:45:10.317-05:00Yes Larry removes all Quest's comments. In his...Yes Larry removes all Quest's comments. In his defense quest claims that someone (Diogenes)used sock puppets to get him in troubleAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-68361510960573367532015-03-04T09:24:22.252-05:002015-03-04T09:24:22.252-05:00I noticed that all Quest's contributions have ...I noticed that all Quest's contributions have been removed. <br /><br />I do not like that. I can assure you that I am not Quest. I am indeed PB, which was obvious from utterly coincidential scrammbled letter-pseudoname, a spokesmen of the new frontloading biology. <br /><br />I am a staunch anti-Darwinian, merely for scientific reasons. I find Big-mouth-know-it-all Darwinian debaters boring to the bone, science stoppers of the first degree.peerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13511262660273927645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-91296268773414708182015-03-04T09:04:50.279-05:002015-03-04T09:04:50.279-05:00Big-mouth, do you mean Douglas Theobald of the --o...Big-mouth, do you mean Douglas Theobald of the --outdated 29 evidences for macro-evolution-- Talkorigins?<br /><br />I had a lengthy chat with Douglas about 10 years ago about the outdatedness of his 29 evidences. Does the TalkO still exist? No, it could not stand up against science fact-discoveries of the past 10 years.<br /><br />I have not seen any new evidence for years...probably because it was just argueing from Darwinian ignorance?peerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13511262660273927645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-19034630132706689692015-03-04T08:54:31.406-05:002015-03-04T08:54:31.406-05:00Diogenes believes that you and quest are the same ...Diogenes believes that you and quest are the same person. It seems you both are obsessed with Diogenes and both attack the same insufficiency of evolution. What do you say to that? <br /><br />Are you Peter Borger? Or Jon Witton?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-12025375571245245752015-03-04T08:49:34.327-05:002015-03-04T08:49:34.327-05:00To adapt and speciate ("evolve" would Bi...To adapt and speciate ("evolve" would Big-mouth say), you only need to reshuffle or get rid of frontloaded info.<br /><br />One act of creation was sufficient. peerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13511262660273927645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-8534449293569639212015-03-04T08:45:37.868-05:002015-03-04T08:45:37.868-05:00Big-mouth (the mr know-it-all) Diogenes says:
&q...Big-mouth (the mr know-it-all) Diogenes says: <br /><br />"Moreover, your hypothetical boneless chicken would be explained by you as due to front-loading. You would say its ancestor had "cryptic information" programming it to turn boneless. A bone less chicken would not falsify your front loading hypothesis."<br /><br /><br />No, it would simple be loss off information.<br /><br />We see it everywhere and it is a motor for adaptation/speciation.<br /><br />peerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13511262660273927645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-42556404992600535812015-03-04T08:38:13.486-05:002015-03-04T08:38:13.486-05:00A friend of mine told me the following true story....A friend of mine told me the following true story. Once, at night in Amsterdam, he was attacked by four or five knife-wielding gangsters trying to rob him off. One of them, Big-mouth, clearly manifested as the leader. My friend grabbed the knife of Big-mouth with his left hand (although it inflicted a deep cut), and knocked him down with a right uppercut. The other gang members fled as boneless chickens.<br /><br />Get it? Most people are just cowards following Big-mouth. That's why Big-mouth rules the world. Poltics, science, everywhere.<br /><br />I see one clear Big-mouth, here. Grab his knife and kick him down.peerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13511262660273927645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-17997560826613072632015-03-04T08:21:29.920-05:002015-03-04T08:21:29.920-05:00Btw, did not get any mails yet...Btw, did not get any mails yet...peerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13511262660273927645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-29276254463297211432015-03-04T08:19:15.039-05:002015-03-04T08:19:15.039-05:00Just a Darwin sceptic, Mannin. ...a sceptic with a...Just a Darwin sceptic, Mannin. ...a sceptic with a cause. peerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13511262660273927645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-54060167361227208792015-03-02T08:05:12.714-05:002015-03-02T08:05:12.714-05:00Maybe try "Peter Borger".... Borger is ...Maybe try "Peter Borger".... Borger is a YEC asthma researcher that fancied himself an expert on all things. He was a fan of front loading, as I recall.nmanninghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14767343547942014627noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-42367851488899552012015-03-02T08:01:32.862-05:002015-03-02T08:01:32.862-05:00"Manning, it is a pity, indeed, that the mind..."Manning, it is a pity, indeed, that the minds of the people are not more open to each other."<br /><br />The point it, ID scientists cannot even produce reviewable, valid science to be published in their OWN journals. That should tell you something.nmanninghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14767343547942014627noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-88389922000736172372015-03-01T04:01:18.019-05:002015-03-01T04:01:18.019-05:00Hey Peer,
What type of scientist are you ?
Peer ...<i>Hey Peer,<br /><br />What type of scientist are you ?</i><br /><br />Peer doesn't seem to have answered this, so I thought Web of Science might help. Unfortunately it doesn't offer any papers by "Terborg P", so we're still in the dark. Maybe a Christian Scientist or a Creation scientist?Athel Cornish-Bowdenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05993242236208061356noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-43218295266857036452015-02-28T21:40:17.562-05:002015-02-28T21:40:17.562-05:00Yes, well: I've long been of the opinion that ...Yes, well: I've long been of the opinion that the Salem Hypothesis should also include doctors.Steve Watsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06022832831084750602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-20179439635278633982015-02-28T06:39:27.099-05:002015-02-28T06:39:27.099-05:00Like cheetahs are (more or less) intelligently des...Like cheetahs are (more or less) intelligently designing impala's and impala's are designing cheeta's.<br />No evolution involved. Jay!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04659697740152598127noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-70813240980905017702015-02-27T20:51:23.659-05:002015-02-27T20:51:23.659-05:00I would have done that, but that would still give ...I would have done that, but that would still give Egnor;s claim more importance than it really has. It's enough to understand that Egnor is arguing on definitions, rather than on whether antibiotic resistance demonstrates the principle that selection, whichever it is, can select from a population and produce populations with different characteristics than the original populations.<br /><br />They have nothing against evolution, so they imagine that if they argue on definitions they at least give the appearance of winning.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-37434263448336776692015-02-27T19:45:11.619-05:002015-02-27T19:45:11.619-05:00Evolution does not have to deal with non-actual ph...Evolution does not have to deal with non-actual phenomena, any more than ID does. How does ID address the matter of boneless chickens?AllanMillerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05955231828424156641noreply@blogger.com