tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post6003943038377987589..comments2024-03-27T14:50:47.345-04:00Comments on <center>Sandwalk</center>: The Story of DNA (Part 1)Larry Moranhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05756598746605455848noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-50745686716311504242007-07-20T09:55:00.001-04:002007-07-20T09:55:00.001-04:00"Way back WHEN", that is."Way back WHEN", that is.Steve LaBonnehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05315820864846104986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-45719762686573112042007-07-20T09:55:00.000-04:002007-07-20T09:55:00.000-04:00I didn't know Judson had put out an expanded secon...I didn't know Judson had put out an expanded second edition. I read the original way back then. I still regard it as one of the best popular history-of-science books ever written, on a par with the finest books written for a broad public by "regular" historians.Steve LaBonnehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05315820864846104986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-59830104304035757082007-07-20T07:15:00.000-04:002007-07-20T07:15:00.000-04:00Oh noes! The story grew on me, so by the time I go...Oh noes! The story grew on me, so by the time I got to the end of the post I had forgotten about it being part 1. But I guess you had to break it up, as this is a story with a twist, eh? :-P<BR/><BR/>PS. I had forgotten about Furberg. So close from so little information, but still failing to synthesize all of the pertinent... DSTorbjörn Larssonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02022193326058378221noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-57047000784637455822007-07-19T18:13:00.000-04:002007-07-19T18:13:00.000-04:00"What we now know as DNA was first isolated in 196...<I>"What we now know as DNA was first isolated in 1968..."</I><BR/><BR/>Did you mean 1868?Steve Reulandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10903926519596087210noreply@blogger.com