tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post5881934937303115153..comments2024-03-27T14:50:47.345-04:00Comments on <center>Sandwalk</center>: A Reason to Doubt the IDiotsLarry Moranhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05756598746605455848noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-76417721754849027462011-10-12T15:44:32.638-04:002011-10-12T15:44:32.638-04:00Is Klinghoffer hoping his readers don't know h...<i>Is Klinghoffer hoping his readers don't know how to use Google?</i><br /><br />Meh, his clientele is too stupid. I bet that even if they know that he is lying, they will just applaud and say things like "Yeah, why are they so afraid of our ID scientists!?"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-9780099407566171922011-10-12T15:41:10.700-04:002011-10-12T15:41:10.700-04:00Larry,
I admire your sense of humour. I read that...Larry,<br /><br />I admire your sense of humour. I read that shit and I got a headache. The IDiots' prideful display of hypocrisy and dishonesty is too much to me. I try not to take them too seriously, but I just can't. I despise them deeply and thoughroughly.<br /><br />Anyway, continue smiling. I will just rest and tell myself that there are worse things than in-your-face hypocrites and liars. Maybe I'll watch a cartoon ...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-10394900858386668682011-10-12T11:29:28.501-04:002011-10-12T11:29:28.501-04:00The answer is simple, it's not a reflection of...The answer is simple, it's not a reflection of the blogs choosing who to comment on, it's a refelction of the sample they have to choose from. <br /><br />They comment less on what Klinghoffer calls "real scientist who advocates intelligent design" because there are so few of them among the giant mass of thumping fools. <br /><br />Compare that to the sample of scientists who support evolution and the signal to noise inverts itself.Zebulonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03401336609768537036noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-80319101807688585702011-10-12T11:17:21.088-04:002011-10-12T11:17:21.088-04:00A quick googling reveals PZ has talked extensively...A quick googling reveals PZ has talked extensively about Dembski, Behe, Meyer, and Luskin among others. Dawkins has also talked extensively about Behe and even written reviews about his books. Is Klinghoffer hoping his readers don't know how to use Google?josenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-84356647509778665412011-10-12T09:26:28.360-04:002011-10-12T09:26:28.360-04:00How about a thoughtful critique of The Myth of Jun...<i>How about a thoughtful critique of The Myth of Junk DNA or Signature in the Cell?</i><br /><br />You mean like these, at Jeffrey Shallit's blog Recursivity:<br /><br /><a href="http://recursed.blogspot.com/2009/10/stephen-meyers-bogus-information-theory.html" rel="nofollow">Stephen Meyer's Bogus Information Theory</a><br /><br /><a href="http://recursed.blogspot.com/2010/01/more-on-signature-in-cell.html" rel="nofollow">More on Signature in the Cell</a>Bayesian Bouffant, FCDnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-86896443632102428762011-10-12T05:55:44.023-04:002011-10-12T05:55:44.023-04:00On which side of that divide does one put Klinghof...On which side of that divide does one put Klinghoffer?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-18658428548919860032011-10-11T23:22:22.090-04:002011-10-11T23:22:22.090-04:00Here are the Google search results for "Luski...Here are the Google search results for <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ascienceblogs.com%2Fpharyngula+Luskin" rel="nofollow">"Luskin"</a>restricted to Pharyngula.<br /><br />Turns out that Luskin is a favorite chew toy down PZ's way, and little wonder given Luskin's prolific writings and limited understanding.<br /><br />The fact that they highlighted <i>The Myth of Junk DNA</i> while you're in the middle of fisking it chapter-by-chapter is icing. Please let us know if Wells comes up with an insightful rejoinder to the genetic load argument for junk DNA (hah).Nullifidianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15207390447020990907noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-41770564385093855152011-10-11T19:03:42.759-04:002011-10-11T19:03:42.759-04:00I had never heard of Ann Gauger. She seems to have...I had never heard of Ann Gauger. She seems to have published in that respected journal, Bio-Complexity. Have you ever noticed her?John Harshmannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-60414271622329912012011-10-11T18:05:17.724-04:002011-10-11T18:05:17.724-04:00"serious science bloggers" and Casey Lus..."serious science bloggers" and Casey Luskin in the same sentence? I really did LOL.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-2078025778537096542011-10-11T17:42:30.523-04:002011-10-11T17:42:30.523-04:00I read that without reaction until he described Ca...I read that without reaction until he described Casey Luskin as a "serious science blogger". Bwahahahahaha!Joelhttp://blog.motheyes.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37148773.post-24008529797121649252011-10-11T17:08:08.518-04:002011-10-11T17:08:08.518-04:00Haha! The Myth of Junk DNA! Nice one IDiot!Haha! The Myth of Junk DNA! Nice one IDiot!KJhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10817974804323066290noreply@blogger.com