Vote for Omar
Here's the latest video from the Liberal Candidate in my riding. These videos are one of the many reasons why I'm going to vote for him.
Strolling with a skeptical biochemist
The old argument of design in nature, as given by Paley, which formerly
seemed to me to be so conclusive, fails, now that the law of natural selection has been discovered. We can no longer argue that, for instance, the beautiful hinge of a bivalve shell must have been made by an intelligent being, like the hinge of a door by man. There seems to be no more design in the variability of organic beings and in the action of natural selection, than in the course which the wind blows.
The world is not inhabited exclusively by fools, and when a subject arouses intense interest, as this one has, something other than semantics is usually at stake.
Stephen Jay Gould (1982)I have championed contingency, and will continue to do so, because its large realm and legitimate claims have been so poorly attended by evolutionary scientists who cannot discern the beat of this different drummer while their brains and ears remain tuned to only the sounds of general theory.
Stephen Jay Gould (2002) p.1339The essence of Darwinism lies in its claim that natural selection creates the fit. Variation is ubiquitous and random in direction. It supplies raw material only. Natural selection directs the course of evolutionary change.
Stephen Jay Gould (1977)Rudyard Kipling asked how the leopard got its spots, the rhino its wrinkled skin. He called his answers "just-so stories." When evolutionists try to explain form and behavior, they also tell just-so stories—and the agent is natural selection. Virtuosity in invention replaces testability as the criterion for acceptance.
Stephen Jay Gould (1980)Since 'change of gene frequencies in populations' is the 'official' definition of evolution, randomness has transgressed Darwin's border and asserted itself as an agent of evolutionary change.
Stephen Jay Gould (1983) p.335The first commandment for all versions of NOMA might be summarized by stating: "Thou shalt not mix the magisteria by claiming that God directly ordains important events in the history of nature by special interference knowable only through revelation and not accessible to science." In common parlance, we refer to such special interference as "miracle"—operationally defined as a unique and temporary suspension of natural law to reorder the facts of nature by divine fiat.
Stephen Jay Gould (1999) p.84
This guy looks like a clown.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous said,"
ReplyDelete"This guy looks like a clown."
No he doesn't; have you looked at his website? http://omaralghabra.ca/
He is an extremely pleasant-looking man who is working hard to defeat the Conservative incumbent in his riding and the Conservatives in general.
If I lived in his riding, I would vote for him.
You, on the other hand, are a boor. I wouldn't vote for you if you ran for dog catcher.
Do they vote for dog catchers in Canada Veronica?
ReplyDeleteCould this clown Omar run for dog catcher?
Anonymous
ReplyDeleteThere you go again hiding behind your Anonymous tag and using my first name.
Re: Do they vote for dog catchers in Canada. . . .?
Look it up
Did you look at Omar Alghabra's website yet.
Veronica, I did look it up and could find no reference to voting for dog catchers in Canada. (They do vote for them in the United States).
ReplyDeleteAre you familiar with voting for dog-catchers in Canada?
By the way I find your posts boorish.
Anonymous said...
ReplyDelete"By the way I find your posts boorish."
C'est la vie.
Veronica, he's just a troll. Acknowledgment just feeds his ego, which is what trolling is about.
ReplyDelete