One More Reason to Visit Canada
I stole this from Bayblab It shows why Canadians like global warming.
Canadian Tourism Federation Welcome Video from Canadian Tourism Federation on Vimeo.
Strolling with a skeptical biochemist
Canadian Tourism Federation Welcome Video from Canadian Tourism Federation on Vimeo.
The old argument of design in nature, as given by Paley, which formerly
seemed to me to be so conclusive, fails, now that the law of natural selection has been discovered. We can no longer argue that, for instance, the beautiful hinge of a bivalve shell must have been made by an intelligent being, like the hinge of a door by man. There seems to be no more design in the variability of organic beings and in the action of natural selection, than in the course which the wind blows.
The world is not inhabited exclusively by fools, and when a subject arouses intense interest, as this one has, something other than semantics is usually at stake.
Stephen Jay Gould (1982)I have championed contingency, and will continue to do so, because its large realm and legitimate claims have been so poorly attended by evolutionary scientists who cannot discern the beat of this different drummer while their brains and ears remain tuned to only the sounds of general theory.
Stephen Jay Gould (2002) p.1339The essence of Darwinism lies in its claim that natural selection creates the fit. Variation is ubiquitous and random in direction. It supplies raw material only. Natural selection directs the course of evolutionary change.
Stephen Jay Gould (1977)Rudyard Kipling asked how the leopard got its spots, the rhino its wrinkled skin. He called his answers "just-so stories." When evolutionists try to explain form and behavior, they also tell just-so stories—and the agent is natural selection. Virtuosity in invention replaces testability as the criterion for acceptance.
Stephen Jay Gould (1980)Since 'change of gene frequencies in populations' is the 'official' definition of evolution, randomness has transgressed Darwin's border and asserted itself as an agent of evolutionary change.
Stephen Jay Gould (1983) p.335The first commandment for all versions of NOMA might be summarized by stating: "Thou shalt not mix the magisteria by claiming that God directly ordains important events in the history of nature by special interference knowable only through revelation and not accessible to science." In common parlance, we refer to such special interference as "miracle"—operationally defined as a unique and temporary suspension of natural law to reorder the facts of nature by divine fiat.
Stephen Jay Gould (1999) p.84
I'm doing my part by not recycling and using as much electricity as possible.
ReplyDelete... and by setting flow hoods on fire.
ReplyDeleteIs Ontarian summer not hot enough for some people...!? o_O
ReplyDeleteI fled the place partly because of...summer! It's living HELL over there!
Vancouver, on the other hand, has another problem. Must. Resist. Temptation. To rant. About. Not having seen the sun. For TWO WEEKS. Grrrr.
At least snow is bright and fluffy and gentle. Rain is dark, depressing, wet, and tries to grope you inappropriately everywhere...
Also, down with the 4.30pm darkness!!!
Ok, Canada does have a climate problem. I agree with these guys...
[/whining]
Psi: Yes. New England should have been the name for the Pacific Northwest.
ReplyDeleteRe: Global warming.
ReplyDeleteI am still sitting on a fence in regard to the human influence on the climate, but this does not look good.
Oops, what happend to the link? Another try:
ReplyDeletethis link
What happens to the links is that Blogger seems to eat them. I double-verified the code and a link but now it shows only as "this link". Anyway, here is the URL:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/11/024995.php
DK: I agree. But regardless whether humans has anything to do with the changes, the changes are for real. The question is what we'll make of it.
ReplyDeleteElli
In all the media and internet verbal diarrhea concerning global warming, Canada is constantly slagged by many parties (especially within Canada) ONLY on the basis of PER CAPITA values for CO2 emissions. The slaggers NEVER mention the ranking of TOTAL CO2 emissions by country. If one looks at those figures, Canada ranks 8th with only 1.9% of the world total. Even assuming a Herculean Canadian effort to greatly reduce emissions, unless other more significant contributors do the same, how much difference would this make in the overall picture, and at what cost to Canada? Does anyone else find this attitude strange?
ReplyDeletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions
WKM
Too bad the maple syrup won't run if it gets too warm!
ReplyDeleteWell now, what's going to happen to Santa at the North Pole? Consider your poor most northerly neighbor...
ReplyDelete